Why would U.S.-Iran hostilities drive oil prices all the way to $150?

A direct conflict would threaten the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most vital energy transit chokepoint. If Iran attempts to block or disrupt shipping in the strait, approximately 20 million barrels of oil per day would be at risk, creating an immediate global supply deficit that existing inventories and OPEC spare capacity could not quickly offset.

How likely is OPEC to intervene to prevent prices from reaching $150?

While OPEC+ prefers stable prices to prevent demand destruction, its actual spare capacity is concentrated in a few countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. In a severe escalation scenario involving Iran, some of this spare capacity might itself be physically threatened or logistically blocked, limiting the group's ability to stabilize the market.

What would a $150 oil price mean for the transition to renewable energy?

In the short term, it would create a dual effect: it would make electric vehicles and renewable power generation highly cost-competitive, accelerating long-term transition plans. However, the immediate economic pain and inflation caused by such a spike could also lead governments to prioritize short-term fossil fuel subsidies and domestic coal or gas production to protect consumers.

Rigzone · June 11, 2026 (Jun 11) · 1 min read

Rystad Warns Oil May Climb Towards $150

Analysis

AI-assisted analysis · reviewed by Yuri Kan

Independent energy research firm Rystad Energy has issued a stark warning that global crude prices could spike toward $150 per barrel if direct military hostilities between the United States and Iran escalate. This projection highlights the extreme vulnerability of global energy supply chains to Middle Eastern geopolitical friction points, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz. For energy markets already navigating tight spare capacity, such a scenario represents a severe systemic shock that would trigger widespread demand destruction and rampant global inflation.

Key Facts

Rystad Energy has modeled a geopolitical risk scenario where crude oil prices could surge toward $150 per barrel.
The primary catalyst for this projected price spike is the potential resumption of active, direct hostilities between the United States and Iran.
A key vulnerability in this escalation scenario is the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint through which over 20% of the world's petroleum liquids consumption passes daily.
The $150 per barrel threshold represents a near-record high that would severely test global economic resilience and central bank monetary policies.
Rystad's warning underscores that current market pricing may underestimating the risk premium associated with Middle Eastern geopolitical instability.

Background & Context

The relationship between the United States and Iran has been characterized by decades of proxy conflicts, economic sanctions, and periodic naval skirmishes in the Persian Gulf. Following the U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, Washington reimposed stringent secondary sanctions targeting Iranian crude exports. Despite these measures, Iran has maintained a level of illicit exports, primarily to China, while periodically threatening to disrupt commercial shipping in the Gulf if its own economic survival is threatened.

Market Impact

A spike to $150 per barrel would fundamentally reshape global economics, acting as a massive tax on consumers and severely impacting non-producing nations. International oil companies would see short-term windfall profits, but this would likely be met with increased calls for windfall taxes and accelerated capital flight into renewable energy alternatives. Refiners would face extreme margin squeeze due to soaring feedstock costs, while central banks would be forced to keep interest rates higher for longer to combat energy-driven inflation, potentially triggering a global recession.

What to Watch

In the immediate term, market analysts will closely monitor naval deployments in the Persian Gulf and any retaliatory rhetoric between Washington and Tehran. Investors should watch for OPEC+ spare capacity assessments, as the cartel's ability to mitigate a sudden supply disruption will dictate how close prices actually get to the $150 mark. Additionally, any shifts in U.S. enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil tankers will serve as an early indicator of escalating tensions.

Why This Matters for Cyprus

While Cyprus is not a major oil producer, a global price shock of this magnitude would drastically increase the island's import bill for refined petroleum products, which currently generate the vast majority of its electricity. Conversely, sustained high global energy prices could accelerate the commercial viability and development timelines of Cyprus's own offshore natural gas discoveries, such as Aphrodite, Cronos, and Glaucus, as Europe seeks secure regional energy alternatives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why would U.S.-Iran hostilities drive oil prices all the way to $150?: A direct conflict would threaten the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most vital energy transit chokepoint. If Iran attempts to block or disrupt shipping in the strait, approximately 20 million barrels of oil per day would be at risk, creating an immediate global supply deficit that existing inventories and OPEC spare capacity could not quickly offset.
How likely is OPEC to intervene to prevent prices from reaching $150?: While OPEC+ prefers stable prices to prevent demand destruction, its actual spare capacity is concentrated in a few countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. In a severe escalation scenario involving Iran, some of this spare capacity might itself be physically threatened or logistically blocked, limiting the group's ability to stabilize the market.
What would a $150 oil price mean for the transition to renewable energy?: In the short term, it would create a dual effect: it would make electric vehicles and renewable power generation highly cost-competitive, accelerating long-term transition plans. However, the immediate economic pain and inflation caused by such a spike could also lead governments to prioritize short-term fossil fuel subsidies and domestic coal or gas production to protect consumers.

Read on Rigzone